

Accuracy Assessment | Recommendation | Basis | |
BG | Medaval | ★★★ Recommendation | Recent clinical validation; recent protocol; multiple clinical validations |
BG | MDR Criteria | Self-measurement | Published evidence |
Consumer Body | Year(s) | Level | Comment | |
BG | Amazon Best Sellers (US) | Latest: 2019 | A (4.0 / 5) |
Christiansen M, Greene C, Pardo S, Warchal-Windham ME, Harrison B, Morin R, Bailey TS. A New, Wireless-enabled Blood Glucose Monitoring System That Links to a Smart Mobile Device: Accuracy and User Performance Evaluation. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):567-73. Epub: 2017 Feb 1. doi: 10.1177/1932296817691301. PMID: 28745099. Available from: PMC5505433.
15197:2013 - Pass General population
Jendrike N, Baumstark A, Pleus S, Liebing C, Kamecke U, Haug C, Freckmann G. Accuracy of five systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose in the hands of adult lay-users and professionals applying ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria and potential insulin dosing errors. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Feb;35(2):301-311. Epub: 2018 Jul 19. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1491832. PMID: 29927663.
15197:2013 - Pass General population
Pleus S, Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Mende J, Link M, Zschornack E, Haug C, Freckmann G. System accuracy evaluation of 18 CE-marked current-generation blood glucose monitoring systems based on EN ISO 15197:2015. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Jan;8(1):e001067. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001067. PMID: 31958308. Available from: drc.bmj.com.
15197:2013 - Pass General population (Note: Modified protocol: One reagent system lot. Also passes the more stringent criterion of at least 95% of values within ±10 mg/dL (0.56 mmol/L) or ±10% of the reference measurement procedure’s results.)
Harrison B, Brown D. Accuracy of a blood glucose monitoring system that recognizes insufficient sample blood volume and allows application of more blood to the same test strip. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Jan;17(1):75-82. Epub: 2020 Jan 10. doi: 10.1080/1743444020201704253. PMID: 31825686.
Ad Hoc protocol Laboratory study (Note: Aligned with ISO 15197:2013 section 6.3.3)
Ad Hoc protocol Clinical study (n=52) (Note: Aligned with ISO 15197:2013 section 8.2)
The accuracy of the CONTOUR®NEXT ONE blood glucose monitoring system was maintained with sample re-application.
Al-Zahrani A, Alshareef R, Farahat F, Borai A. Assessing the Accuracy of Different Glucometers Based on the Laboratory Reference Method. Clin Lab. 2020 Oct 1;66(10):200132. doi: 10.7754/Clin.Lab.2020.200132. PMID: 33073954.
Unknown protocol General population
Protocol not stated in abstract.
Parkin CG. If SMBG Accuracy Is Critical to Patient Safety, Why Are Inaccurate Meters Still on the Market? J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):574-6. Epub: 2017 Feb 1. doi: 10.1177/1932296817693256. PMID: 28745090. Available from: PMC5505436.
The publication is a letter or correspondence in which the Ascensia (Bayer) Contour Next One is referenced.
See: J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 May;11(3):567-573.